COVID-19 Vaccines: What Does the Evidence Say about Delaying the Second Dose ?
Debate continues around whether delaying second COVID-19 vaccine doses is a reasonable strategy amid global supply shortages. Several governments and advisory bodies have extended the interval between doses to increase first-dose coverage, hoping to curb transmission and ease pressure on strained health systems. Early trial data suggest one dose of Pfizer, Moderna, or AstraZeneca offers meaningful short-term protection, but evidence on durability and long-term efficacy with delayed boosting is limited. Concerns also persist about fostering partially immune populations that could encourage vaccine-resistant variants and reduce public confidence. With modelling studies hinting at potential population-level benefits, the balance between urgency, safety, and scientific certainty remains unsettled, underscoring the need for stronger empirical data.
Unlock the Full original article
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this original article
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics