Loading...
Search Filters
Date Range
toReport Types
Condition
See all (55)
Region of the Body
See all (19)
Specialties
See all (18)
Emerging Treatments
OE Recommends Topics
Multimedia
Journal
Conference Series
Evidence Series
Showing 1 - 20 of 1107
Midterm outcomes for cementless porous tantalum monoblock vs cemented modular tibial components
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):666-674
Highly porous metal tibia comparable to traditional modular cemented tibia in TKA
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):34-42.
Smaller migration with monoblock versus modular tibial component in uncemented TKA
Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec;87(6):607-614
All-polyethylene and modular metal-backed tibial component clinically - equivalent choices
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1165-9. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
Potentially lower migration with all-poly vs metal-backed tibia component in total knee arthroplasty
Acta Orthop. 2018 Aug;89(4):412-417. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1464317
No difference between cemented and hybrid component fixation in Rotaglide TKA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1843-8
TKA in obese patients: Two-year outcomes between stemmed vs. standard tibial implants
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):137-145
Cementless/screw fixation vs. cemented fixation of tibial component in young TKA patients
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jul;22(7):1585-90
Similar outcome with cemented and cementless tibial fixation at 9.5 years after TKA
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Dec;29(12):2397-401
Femoral component rotation comparable between cemented and hydroxyapatite-coated implants
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jan;89(1):39-44.
Mobile rotating-platform is comparable to fixed-bearing design for total knee arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2104-12.
Peri-prosthetic bone density after cemented versus trabecular fixation
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery BR; 2011; 93(B); 1033-1044
Showing 1 - 20 of 1107