To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Erythromycin- and Colistin-Loaded Cement for Infection in Total Knee Arthoplasty

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2024

Erythromycin- and Colistin-Loaded Cement for Infection in Total Knee Arthoplasty

Vol: 306| Issue: 12| Number:18| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

The Use of Erythromycin and Colistin Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Infection: A Randomized Study in 2,893 Knees With a 9-year Average Follow-Up.

J Arthroplasty. 2024 01-Sep;():. 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.039

Contributing Authors:
A Pardo-Pol A Fontanellas-Fes D Pérez-Prieto L Sorli P Hinarejos JC Monllau

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Two thousand eight hundred ninety-three knees from patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive plain bone cement (n=1,452) or erythromycin and colistin-loaded bone cement (n=1,441). The primary outcome of interest was the rate of deep prosthetic joint infection. Secondary outcomes included rates of aseptic loosening and antibiotic resistance in infecting organism...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue