LOGIN
COA 2015: Internal and external fixation comparable for distal radius fractures in elderly
June 2015
COA 2015: Internal and external fixation comparable for distal radius fractures in elderly
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Outcome of Dorsally Displaced Unstable Extraarticular Distal Radius Fractures in the Aging Population: External Fixation with Percutaneous Pinning vs. Open Reduction Internal Fixation
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
65 patients with dorsally displaced unstable extraarticular distal radius fractures (DRFs) were randomized to undergo fixation externally with percutaneous pinning, or internally via open reduction. The study was conducted in order to compare outcomes between the two groups in terms of Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and the Michigan...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.