To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Arthroscopic vs. Fluoroscopic ORIF for Distal Radius Fracture

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2025

Arthroscopic vs. Fluoroscopic ORIF for Distal Radius Fracture

Vol: 307| Issue: 4| Number:48| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Arthroscopic-assisted versus fluoroscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation for distal radius fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine (Baltimore) . 2025 Feb 7;104(6):e41434.

Contributing Authors:
K Chen S Yang Y Cheng W Xiang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Five randomized controlled trials including 340 patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing AAORIF vs. FAORIF. Pooled outcomes of interest included wrist range of motion (flexion, extension, pronation, supination), DASH scores, VAS pain scores, operative time, and complication rates. AAORIF showed significantly improved ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue