To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Partial Fasciectomy by Bruner Approach Versus Zetaplasty for Dupuytren Disease

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2025

Partial Fasciectomy by Bruner Approach Versus Zetaplasty for Dupuytren Disease

Vol: 307| Issue: 2| Number:32| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Dupuytren Disease Surgical Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Partial Fasciectomy by Bruner Approach Versus Zetaplasty.

Hand (N Y) . 2024 Nov;19(8):1300-1307.

Contributing Authors:
RG Leão VY de Moraes LR Nakachima JC Belloti JBG Santos

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty-two adult patients with Dupuytren disease were randomized to receive partial fasciectomy using either the Bruner incision (n=23) or the zetaplasty incision (n=25). The primary outcome of interest was functional improvement measured by the DASH score. Secondary outcomes included correction of metacarpophalangeal (MP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint extension, pain levels using the vi...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue