Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:5 Issue:6 Number:53 ISSN#:2564-2537
ACE Report #9061
Ace Report Cover Shoulder & Elbow

COA 2016: Cost-effectiveness of single row vs. double row rotator cuff repair methods

How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. COA 2016: Cost-effectiveness of single row vs. double row rotator cuff repair methods. ACE Report. 2016;5(6):53. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/9061

Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Cost-effectiveness of Single Row versus Double Row Constructs in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Contributing Authors: AL Huang K Thavorn S van Katwyk P Lapner

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here


This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.


90 patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to received either single row or double row constructs. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of the two aforementioned treatments over 2-year follow-up. Findings indicated a higher case cost in the double row repair, but also higher quality adjusted life years (QALY) compared to the single ...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

For Reprints and Permissions, click here

Please Login or Join to leave comments.