LOGIN
COA 2016: Cost-effectiveness of single row vs. double row rotator cuff repair methods
June 2016
COA 2016: Cost-effectiveness of single row vs. double row rotator cuff repair methods
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Cost-effectiveness of Single Row versus Double Row Constructs in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
90 patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to received either single row or double row constructs. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of the two aforementioned treatments over 2-year follow-up. Findings indicated a higher case cost in the double row repair, but also higher quality adjusted life years (QALY) compared to the single ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.