To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Proficiency-based progression training with simulator increases arthroscopic Bankart skill

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2016

Proficiency-based progression training with simulator increases arthroscopic Bankart skill

Vol: 5| Issue: 2| Number:61| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A Proficiency-Based Progression Training Curriculum Coupled With a Model Simulator Results in the Acquisition of a Superior Arthroscopic Bankart Skill Set

Arthroscopy. 2015 Oct;31(10):1854-71

Contributing Authors:
RL Angelo RK Ryu RA Pedowitz W Beach J Burns J Dodds L Field M Getelman R Hobgood L McIntyre AG Gallagher

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Forty-four postgraduate year 4 or 5 orthopedic residents were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 skills training protocols in order to learn how to perform an arthroscopic Bankart repair. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a proficiency-based progression (PBP) program using simulation in comparison to the same curriculum without proficiency requirements and compared to a trad...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue