LOGIN
ISAKOS 2015: Minor complications and time to return to work reduced with ECTR vs. OCTR
June 2015
ISAKOS 2015: Minor complications and time to return to work reduced with ECTR vs. OCTR
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Endoscopic Release is at Least as Safe as Conventional Open for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
27 studies were included in a meta-analysis comparing open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) and endoscopic carpal tunnel reduction (ECTR). The purpose of this study was to shed light on the comparative safety of the alternate ECTR method with the conventional OCTR for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Results demonstrated that ECTR had a faster return to work by 10 days and a lower minor complication rate...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.