To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

CDA versus ACDF for clinical efficacy, cervical ROM, and adjacent segment degeneration

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2015

CDA versus ACDF for clinical efficacy, cervical ROM, and adjacent segment degeneration

Vol: 4| Issue: 3| Number:29| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion

Int Orthop. 2014 Dec;38(12):2533-41

Contributing Authors:
HX Zhang YD Shao Y Chen Y Hou L Cheng M Si L Nie

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

111 patients with degenerative cervical disc disease were randomized to surgery through either cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The purpose of this study was to compare clinical efficacy and cervical spine range of motion (ROM) at a minimum of 48 months after surgery. The results indicated no significant differences between groups in clinical outc...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.