LOGIN
CDA versus ACDF for clinical efficacy, cervical ROM, and adjacent segment degeneration
March 2015
CDA versus ACDF for clinical efficacy, cervical ROM, and adjacent segment degeneration
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion
Int Orthop. 2014 Dec;38(12):2533-41Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
111 patients with degenerative cervical disc disease were randomized to surgery through either cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The purpose of this study was to compare clinical efficacy and cervical spine range of motion (ROM) at a minimum of 48 months after surgery. The results indicated no significant differences between groups in clinical outc...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.