Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:3 Issue:5 Number:35 ISSN#:2563-5476
Meta-analysis
ACE Report #6233
Ace Report Cover Hand & Wrist

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release for CTS


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release for CTS. ACE Report. 2014;3(5):35. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/6233

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel decompression

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Apr;134(4):585-93. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1898-z. Epub 2014 Jan 12.

Contributing Authors: L Chen X Duan X Huang J Lv K Peng Z Xiang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

15 randomized controlled trials (n=1,596) comparing endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) with open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) for carpal tunnel syndrome were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare these two surgical approaches with respect to functional recovery within 3 months post-operation and safety. Pooled results indicated that although there we...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE

Please Login or Join to leave comments.