To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Cemented stem implantation: Finite element simulation vs. clinical bone densitometry

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2014

Cemented stem implantation: Finite element simulation vs. clinical bone densitometry

Vol: 3| Issue: 4| Number:54| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Mid-term study of bone remodeling after femoral cemented stem implantation: comparison between DXA and finite element simulation

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.028.

Contributing Authors:
A Herrera S Rebollo E Ibarz J Mateo S Gabarre L Gracia

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

64 patients scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a VerSys or ABG-II cemented femoral stem. Bone mineral density was monitored over a 5 year follow-up period and a finite element (FE) simulation was run concurrently, modelling stem mechanical behavior and measuring the biomechanical variations. At 5 years postoperatively, correlations between clinical result...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue