
Cemented stem implantation: Finite element simulation vs. clinical bone densitometry

Cemented stem implantation: Finite element simulation vs. clinical bone densitometry
Mid-term study of bone remodeling after femoral cemented stem implantation: comparison between DXA and finite element simulation
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.028.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
64 patients scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a VerSys or ABG-II cemented femoral stem. Bone mineral density was monitored over a 5 year follow-up period and a finite element (FE) simulation was run concurrently, modelling stem mechanical behavior and measuring the biomechanical variations. At 5 years postoperatively, correlations between clinical result...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.