To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparing Early Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted vs. Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2022

Comparing Early Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted vs. Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty

Vol: 302| Issue: 1| Number:8| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

Orthop Surg . 2022 Sep;14(9):1972-1980.

Contributing Authors:
J Xu L Li J Fu C Xu M Ni W Chai L Hao G Zhang J Chen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-two patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis were randomized to undergo a robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (n=37) or a conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (n=35). Outcomes of interest included functional outcomes (Knee Society Score; WOMAC; range of motion), operative time and length of stay, the rate of lower limb vein thrombosis, and radiographic alignment and outlier ...

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.