To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparing Early Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted vs. Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2022

Comparing Early Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted vs. Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty

Vol: 302| Issue: 1| Number:8| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

Orthop Surg . 2022 Sep;14(9):1972-1980.

Contributing Authors:
J Xu L Li J Fu C Xu M Ni W Chai L Hao G Zhang J Chen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-two patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis were randomized to undergo a robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (n=37) or a conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (n=35). Outcomes of interest included functional outcomes (Knee Society Score; WOMAC; range of motion), operative time and length of stay, the rate of lower limb vein thrombosis, and radiographic alignment and outlier ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue