To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Vol:211 Issue:1 Number:1 ISSN#:2564-2537
RCT
ACE Report #14399
Ace Report Cover Trauma

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block vs. Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Hip Fractures


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Pericapsular Nerve Group Block vs. Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Hip Fractures. ACE Report. 2022;211(1):1. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/14399

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for pain control in hip fractures: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res . 2022 Feb;108(1):103135.

Contributing Authors:
F Mosaffa M Taheri A Manafi Rasi H Samadpour E Memary A Mirkheshti

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Fifty two patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery were randomized to receive a pericapsular nerve group block (PENG, n=30) or fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB). The primary outcomes of interest were postoperative pain measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and postoperative analgesic requirements. Patients in the PENG group had lower VAS scores at 15 minutes and 12 hours postoperativ...

Ace Report Preview Image
CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE
For Reprints and Permissions, click here

Please Login or Join to leave comments.