To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Allograft versus FCR tendon autograft in CMC trapeziectomy and suspension-interposition arthroplasty

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2018

Allograft versus FCR tendon autograft in CMC trapeziectomy and suspension-interposition arthroplasty

Vol: 7| Issue: 5| Number:25| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Trapeziectomy With Suspension-Interposition Arthroplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Use of Allograft Versus Flexor Carpi Radialis Tendon

J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Dec;42(12):978-986

Contributing Authors:
M Marks S Hensler M Wehrli AG Scheibler S Schindele

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients with first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis were randomized to either the use of an allograft for suspension-interposition arthroplasty or to the use of a flexor carpi radialis tendon autograft. Patients were assessed for the primary outcome measure of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire over a 12-month follow-up. Results demonstrated no significant differences between groups from 6 we...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue