To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Preemptive periacetabular vs intraarticular bupivacaine for analgesia after arthroscopy

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2017

Preemptive periacetabular vs intraarticular bupivacaine for analgesia after arthroscopy

Vol: 6| Issue: 8| Number:3| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Preemptive Analgesia in Hip Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preemptive Periacetabular or Intra-articular Bupivacaine in Addition to Postoperative Intra-articular Bupivacaine

Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):118-124

Contributing Authors:
E Amar E Rath M Drexler A Shlaifer ZT Sharfman HD Martin E Kazum Y Warschawski M Paret S Brill

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

42 patients with femoroacetabular impingement and scheduled for arthroscopic intervention were randomized to preemptive analgesia with either periacetabular bupivacaine injection or intraarticular bupivacaine injection. Patients were assessed for pain within 30 minutes after release from the postanaesthesia care unit, and up to 18 hours after surgery. Following discharge, pain was assessed daily f...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue