To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Greater 24-hr analgesic efficacy of intermittent vs. continuous ACB in ACL reconstruction

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2017

Greater 24-hr analgesic efficacy of intermittent vs. continuous ACB in ACL reconstruction

Vol: 6| Issue: 6| Number:3| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Post-operative analgesia using intermittent vs. continuous adductor canal block technique: a randomized controlled trial

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Nov;60(10):1379-1385

Contributing Authors:
P Verma R Gupta D Thapa S Gombar V Ahuja D Dhiman

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

50 patients scheduled for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were randomized to postoperative analgesia with either an intermittent or continuous adductor canal block for 24 hours after surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if intermittent boluses of 15mL ropivacaine over 24 hours was more effective for reducing pain than continuous infusion of ropivacaine at 2.5mL/hr over 24 ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue