To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

PSI TKA associated with higher rate of intra- & postoperative tibial outliers vs computer navigation

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2017

PSI TKA associated with higher rate of intra- & postoperative tibial outliers vs computer navigation

Vol: 6| Issue: 5| Number:5| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:N/A
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Abnormal rate of intraoperative and postoperative implant positioning outliers using “MRI-based patient-specific” compared to “computer assisted” instrumentation in total knee replacement

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Nov;24(11):3441-3447

Contributing Authors:
M Ollivier Q Tribot-Laspiere J Amzallag P Boisrenoult N Pujol P Beaufils

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

80 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to undergo the surgery using either patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) or computer-assisted surgery (CAS) navigation technology for guiding bone cuts. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative outliers between groups for component alignment. Intraoperative results demonstrated a s...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue