No significant differences in gait parameters between CAS femur-first and conventional THA
No significant differences in gait parameters between CAS femur-first and conventional THA
Gait six month and one-year after computer assisted Femur First THR vs. conventional THR. Results of a patient- and observer- blinded randomized controlled trial
Gait Posture. 2016 Sep;49:418-25Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
64 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomized to either a computer-navigated "femur first" technique or conventional free-hand technique. The purpose of this study was to compare gait speed and hip range of motion during gait at 6 months and 1-year postoperatively. Results demonstrated no significant differences between groups in any outcome measure.
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.