To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No clinical benefit of cold compression therapy vs. cold packs after shoulder arthroscopy

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2016

No clinical benefit of cold compression therapy vs. cold packs after shoulder arthroscopy

Vol: 5| Issue: 10| Number:48| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Cold versus cold compression therapy after shoulder arthroscopy: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jul;24(7):2209-15.

Contributing Authors:
M Alfuth M Strietzel T Vogler D Rosenbaum D Liem

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

52 patients were randomized to receive either cold pack or cold compression therapy following shoulder arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine if a cold compression system, containing interchangeable cold packs with bandage and pump system, offered a significant decrease in pain and inflammation when compared to standard cold packs up to 24 hours postoperatively. With the exception...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue