LOGIN
Conventional vs biologic subtrochanteric hip fracture fixation with proximal locked plate
November 2016
Conventional vs biologic subtrochanteric hip fracture fixation with proximal locked plate
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Clinical outcome of conventional versus biological fixation of subtrochanteric fractures by proximal femoral locked plate
Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1309-17Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
46 patients with a comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fracture were randomized to one of two different fixation groups. One group underwent open reduction and internal plate fixation with a limited exposure technique, "joy-stick" reduction under C-arm imaging, and submuscular plate placement ("biological fixation" group). The other group underwent standard ORIF (direct fixation group). Significant...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.