
No functional or clinical difference between MIS and standard TKA

No functional or clinical difference between MIS and standard TKA
A prospective randomized study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jul 7;92(7):1584-90Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
134 patients with symptomatic knee OA, scheduled for total knee arthroplasty, were randomized to the use of either minimally invasive instruments or a standard approach for the TKA procedure. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcomes of these two techniques. At 1 year, the minimally invasive surgical technique was not found to provide any substantial benefit, in terms of radiograph...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.