
AAOS 2016: Unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation for TLIF

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
7 randomized controlled trials with a total of 465 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of unilateral and bilateral instrumentation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Findings indicated no significant differences between the two methods of instrumentation in complication rate, patient-reported outcomes, length of stay, o...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.