LOGIN
No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation vs. conventional instrumentation in TKA
February 2016
No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation vs. conventional instrumentation in TKA
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
No difference in mechanical alignment and femoral component placement between patient-specific instrumentation and conventional instrumentation in TKA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Nov;23(11):3288-95Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
10 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty for outcome parameters of component alignment and operative time. Results of pooled analyses demonstrated no significant differences in accurate restoration of the mecha...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.