To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Lateralized vs non-lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 2 year rotational function

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
December 2015

Lateralized vs non-lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 2 year rotational function

Vol: 4| Issue: 12| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Clinical performance of lateralized versus non-lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1397-404

Contributing Authors:
S Greiner C Schmidt S Herrmann S Pauly C Perka

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

34 patients with rotator cuff arthropathy were randomized to undergo either non-lateralized or bony increased offset lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of the study was to determine if rotational function differed between non-lateralized and lateralized arthroplasties up to 2 years post-operatively. Results found both surgical methods to be effective in restoring shoulder funct...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue