To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Improved clinical outcome of anteromedial vs. transtibial drilling in ACL reconstruction

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2015

Improved clinical outcome of anteromedial vs. transtibial drilling in ACL reconstruction

Vol: 4| Issue: 12| Number:7| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:3
Journal Level of Evidence:3

Outcome of Single-Bundle Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Anteromedial Versus the Transtibial Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Arthroscopy. 2015 Sep;31(9):1784-94

Contributing Authors:
Y Chen KH Chua A Singh JH Tan X Chen SH Tan BC Tai K Lingaraj

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

10 studies comparing anteromedial and transtibial drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were included for analysis. All studies were qualitatively compared while only 6 studies were used for meta-analysis. The purpose of the study was to determine if the anteromedial technique resulted in improved clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction when compared to the...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue