To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Trigger point dry needling with and without neuroscience education for patients with cLBP

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2015

Trigger point dry needling with and without neuroscience education for patients with cLBP

Vol: 4| Issue: 10| Number:34| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Neuroscience education in addition to trigger point dry needling for the management of patients with mechanical chronic low back pain: A preliminary clinical trial

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015 Jul;19(3):464-72

Contributing Authors:
M Téllez-García AI De-la-Llave-Rincón J Salom-Moreno M Palacios-Ceña R Ortega-Santiago C Fernández-de-Las-Peñas

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

12 patients diagnosed with low back pain (LBP) and active trigger points were randomized to either trigger point dry needling (TrP-DN) with or without the addition of neuroscience education sessions (EDU). Intervention was provided over 3 weeks, with follow-up of outcomes of pain, disability, kinesiophobia, and pressure pain threshold performed at 1 week post-intervention. Results demonstrated no ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue