To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar malreduction rate, functional outcome between TightRope and syndesmotic screw

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2015

Similar malreduction rate, functional outcome between TightRope and syndesmotic screw

Vol: 4| Issue: 9| Number:15| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography

Injury. 2015 Jun;46(6):1119-26

Contributing Authors:
T Kortekangas O Savola T Flinkkilä S Lepojärvi S Nortunen P Ohtonen J Katisko H Pakarinen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

47 patients with pronation-external rotation, Weber C-type ankle fracture with unstable syndesmosis injury were randomized to either syndesmotic screw fixation or dynamic, suture-button device fixation (TightRope; Arthrex). The purpose of the study was to compare malreduction rates intraoperatively and at 2-year follow-up between fixation methods, as well was clinical and functional outcomes at 1 ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue