LOGIN
Comparison of existing footprint vs bony landmark technique for graft placement in DB-ACLR
August 2015
Comparison of existing footprint vs bony landmark technique for graft placement in DB-ACLR
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:2
Placement of Double Tunnels in ACL Reconstruction Using Bony Landmarks Versus Existing Footprint Remnant: A Prospective Clinical Study With 2-Year Follow-up
Am J Sports Med. 2015 May;43(5):1206-14Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
72 male patients who qualified for double bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were randomized to the procedure performed using either the existing footprint (EF) technique or bony landmark (BL) technique for graft placement. Arthroscopic and clinical outcomes were analyzed to compare outcome of each technique at a mean of 36.9 months postoperativey. Both techniques for graft pla...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.