To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No significant differences in results between high-flexion and standard PS TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2015

No significant differences in results between high-flexion and standard PS TKA

Vol: 4| Issue: 5| Number:21| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Standard versus high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses

Orthopedics. 2015 Mar 1;38(3):e206-12

Contributing Authors:
N Li J Li P Li D Wang M Liu L Xia

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eight randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis evaluating the effects of high-flexion posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee prostheses. Studies which compared high-flexion PS knee prostheses to standard PS knee prostheses were included. Outcomes analyzed included knee range of motion, flexion angle, clinical outcome scores, and complications. The meta-analysis demonstrated n...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue