To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparison of clinical outcome with the Triathlon vs. Kinemax knee system

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2015

Comparison of clinical outcome with the Triathlon vs. Kinemax knee system

Vol: 4| Issue: 3| Number:57| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Implant design influences patient outcome after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial

Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):64-70

Contributing Authors:
DF Hamilton JT Burnett R Patton CR Howie M Moran AH Simpson P Gaston

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

212 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a Triathlon implant or Kinemax implant. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results of the newer-generation device (Triathlon) versus the older-generation knee system (Kinemax). Oxford Knee Score, pain, range of motion, lower limb power symmetry, and patient satisfaction were assessed over 3 years po...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue