To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Extensor tendon injury: Early mobilization superior to immobilization at 12 weeks post-op

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2015

Extensor tendon injury: Early mobilization superior to immobilization at 12 weeks post-op

Vol: 4| Issue: 3| Number:14| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Rehabilitation regimens following surgical repair of extensor tendon injuries of the hand-a systematic review of controlled trials

J Hand Microsurg. 2012 Dec;4(2):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s12593-012-0075-x. Epub 2012 Sep 15.

Contributing Authors:
CY Ng J Chalmer DJ Macdonald SS Mehta D Nuttall AC Watts

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

5 prospective randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing static immobilization, dynamic splinting, and early active mobilization in the management of surgically-treated extensor tendon injuries were included in this review. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare these three rehabilitation regimens with respect to total active motion (TAM). Results in...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue