To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Knee OA patients: lateral trunk lean gait walking expends more energy than normal walking

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2014

Knee OA patients: lateral trunk lean gait walking expends more energy than normal walking

Vol: 3| Issue: 6| Number:26| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Lateral trunk lean gait modification increases the energy cost of treadmill walking in those with knee osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Feb;22(2):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Contributing Authors:
J Takacs AA Kirkham F Perry J Brown E Marriott D Monkman J Havey S Hung KL Campbell MA Hunt

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

12 patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis participated in two treadmill interventions: one session of normal treadmill walking and one session of increased lateral trunk lean walking, in randomized order, to determine the effect of lateral trunk lean gait modification on energy expenditure. Results found that lateral trunk lean walking significantly increased steady-state oxygen cons...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue