To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Gamma nail more effective than sliding hip screw in unstable intertrochanteric fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
July 2014

Gamma nail more effective than sliding hip screw in unstable intertrochanteric fractures

Vol: 3| Issue: 7| Number:36| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur

Int Orthop. 2014 Jan;38(1):155-61. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2196-7.

Contributing Authors:
I Aktselis C Kokoroghiannis E Fragkomichalos G Koundis A Deligeorgis E Daskalakis J Vlamis N Papaioannou

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eighty patients with a 31-A2.2 or A2.3 AO/OTA multifragmentary intertrochanteric fracture were randomized to receive either a Gamma intramedullary nail or an AMBI sliding hip screw. Parker mobility, Barthel Index, and EuroQol-5D quality of life scores were primary outcomes. After 12 months, patients treated with a Gamma nail achieved higher outcome scores compared to AMBI sliding hip screw and wit...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue