To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Air-pulsed cryotherapy: No effect on long-term recovery of damaged muscles

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2013

Air-pulsed cryotherapy: No effect on long-term recovery of damaged muscles

Vol: 2| Issue: 9| Number:64| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effects of air-pulsed cryotherapy on neuromuscular recovery subsequent to exercise-induced muscle damage

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1942-51

Contributing Authors:
G Guilhem F Hug A Couturier S Regnault L Bournat JR Filliard S Dorel

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

OE EXCLUSIVE

Gael Guilhem discusses the effects of air-pulsed cryotherapy on neuromuscular recovery subsequent to exercise-induced muscle damage

Synopsis

24 men were included in this trial to examine the effect of cyrotherapy on neuromuscular recovery following exercise induced muscle damage. Subjects were randomized to either receive air-pulsed cryotherapy following exercise induced muscle damage (EMID) or passive recovery following EMID (control). The results demonstrated that there was no difference between groups (Control vs. Cryo) in terms of ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue