To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Correlation between MRI and clinical findings following knee cartilage repair

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Correlation between MRI and clinical findings following knee cartilage repair

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:74| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes After Cartilage Repair Surgery in the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1426-34. doi: 10.1177/0363546513485931. Epub 2013 Apr 30

Contributing Authors:
AJ Blackman MV Smith DC Flanigan MJ Matava RW Wright RH Brophy

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

The systematic review included 26 studies (randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series), 15 of which were used for meta-analysis, the purpose of which to determine the correlation between MRI findings and clinical outcome following cartilage repair surgery. The procedures included were autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral autograft transfer system, and microfracture...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue