LOGIN
Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty no better than manual implantation
September 2014
Robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty no better than manual implantation
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Aug;85-A(8):1470-8Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
154 patients scheduled for total hip replacement were randomized to undergo either conventional manual implantation of an S-ROM prosthesis or robotic-assisted implantation of such prosthesis using the five-axis ROBODOC. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically through a 24 month follow-up period. Eighteen percent (18%) of attempted robotic implantations failed and had to be converted...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.