To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference between cemented and cementeless acetabular components

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
February 2015

No difference between cemented and cementeless acetabular components

Vol: 4| Issue: 2| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: is there evidence that cementless fixation is better?

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jan 16;95(2):168-74. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01652

Contributing Authors:
N Toossi B Adeli AJ Timperley FS Haddad M Maltenfort J Parvizi

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

45 articles (26,576 primary total hip arthroplasties) were selected in this meta-analysis to study the survivorship and revision rates of cemented acetabular components versus cementless acetabular components, in a minimum of 10 years of follow up. Although the results did not indicate any differences in survivorship rates between the two components, the regression analysis of estimated odds ratio...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue