To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Knee OA treated with chondroitin sulfate: cartilage volume is not associated with symptoms

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Knee OA treated with chondroitin sulfate: cartilage volume is not associated with symptoms

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:321| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effect of 12 months treatment with chondroitin sulfate on cartilage volume in knee osteoarthritis patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study using MRI

Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Sep;31(9):1347-57. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2022-4. Epub 2012 Jun 23

Contributing Authors:
JJ Railhac M Zaim AS Saurel J Vial B Fournie

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

48 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive treatment with Structum (chondroitin sulfate) or a placebo. Over 48 weeks, the Structum group demonstrated an increase in total cartilage volume, whereas the control group demonstrated a decrease. However, this difference was not statistically significant. At 4 weeks, scores for pain, while in motion, were significantly lower in the S...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue