To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Surgical advice does not differ from exercise rehabilitation post-lumbar discectomy

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Surgical advice does not differ from exercise rehabilitation post-lumbar discectomy

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:501| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of usual surgical advice versus a non-aggravating six-month gym-based exercise rehabilitation program post lumbar discectomy: results at one-year follow-up

Spine J. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):357-63. Epub 2006 Jun 12.

Contributing Authors:
Barry L Donaldson Edward A Shipton Grahame Inglis Darren Rivett Chris Frampton

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

93 lumbar discectomy patients were randomized to undergo either an exercise-based rehabilitation or receive standard rehabilitation advice post-surgery. The outcomes measured throughout the course of the rehabilitation period were pain levels, function levels, psychological well-being, time off work, medication levels, and number of doctor/therapist visits. Both groups of patients improved, but b...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue