To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Accelerated weightbearing following autologous chondrocyte implantation is acceptable

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

Accelerated weightbearing following autologous chondrocyte implantation is acceptable

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:43| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effect of accelerated weightbearing after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation on the femoral condyle on radiographic and clinical outcome after 2 years: a prospective, randomized controlled pilot study

Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37 Suppl 1:88S-96S. Epub 2009 Oct 21.

Contributing Authors:
B Wondrasch L Zak GH Welsch S Marlovits

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Thirty-one patients undergoing matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) of the femoral condyle were randomized postoperatively to either accelerated or delayed weightbearing in their rehabilitation. The primary results were radiological and clinical outcome measures, using MRI and the International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), the Tegner activity score, and the Kn...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue