LOGIN
No differences in conventional and computer navigated ACL reconstruction
August 2013
No differences in conventional and computer navigated ACL reconstruction
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Does computer navigation system really improve early clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Knee. 2012 Mar;19(2):73-7. Epub 2011 Apr 1Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
5 randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials were identified that compared early clinical results of computer navigated and conventional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction methods at 24-28 months. Results indicated there were no significant differences in primary outcomes including pivot shift test, Lachman test, IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner outcomes between the two groups.
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.