To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No differences between cruciate retaining and substituting TKA implants

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2013

No differences between cruciate retaining and substituting TKA implants

Vol: 2| Issue: 3| Number:180| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Knee Range of Motion During the First Two Years After Use of Posterior Cruciate-Stabilizing or Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Prostheses- A Randomized Clinical Trial

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Dec;90(12):2579-86.

Contributing Authors:
R Chaudhary LA Beaupre DW Johnston

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

100 patients suffering from non-inflammatory osteoarthritis of the knee, scheduled for unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty, were randomized to receive a posterior cruciate substituting or retaining implant to primarily assess differences in range of motion with secondary analysis of pain, function, and quality of life. Results from an average final follow up of 22.7 months indicated that bo...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue