To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Arthroscopic surgery for knee OA provides no additional benefit to physical therapy

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2013

Arthroscopic surgery for knee OA provides no additional benefit to physical therapy

Vol: 2| Issue: 3| Number:58| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A Randomized Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 11;359(11):1097-107.

Contributing Authors:
Alexandra Kirkley Trevor B Birmingham Robert B Litchfield J Robert Giffin Kevin R Willits Cindy J Wong Brian G Feagan Allan Donner Sharon H Griffin Linda M D’Ascanio Janet E Pope Peter J Fowler

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

178 patients (>18 yr of age) with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned to surgical lavage and arthroscopic debridement together with optimized physical and medical therapy or to treatment with physical and medical therapy alone. Arthroscopic surgery for knee OA provided no additional clinical or symptomatic benefit over optimized physical and medical therapy.

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue