To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Single vs Dual Drains in BE-ULBD for Lumbar Stenosis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2025

Single vs Dual Drains in BE-ULBD for Lumbar Stenosis

Vol: 307| Issue: 9| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Does the number of drain tubes influence the formation of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma following biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (BE-ULBD) in patients with two-level adjacent lumbar spinal stenosis? a prospe

J Orthop Surg Res . 2025 Jun 24;20(1):615.

Contributing Authors:
Z Zhong J Ying S Zhang K Cai X Jing Z Xu L Jiang T Wu G Wei Q Hu

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eighty-nine patients with two-level adjacent lumbar spinal stenosis were randomized to receive one drain tube (n=43) or two drain tubes (n=46) after BE-ULBD. The primary outcome was the cross-sectional area (CSA) of POSEH on MRI at 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative leg-pain VAS, total drainage volume, and length of stay. Outcomes were assessed up to 72 hours for MRI (and clinical...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue