To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparison of IONM Between Propofol And Remimazolam During TIVA In Cervical Spine Surgery

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2025

Comparison of IONM Between Propofol And Remimazolam During TIVA In Cervical Spine Surgery

Vol: 307| Issue: 5| Number:35| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring between propofol and remimazolam during total intravenous anesthesia in the cervical spine surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Korean J Anesthesiol . 2025 Feb;78(1):16-29.

Contributing Authors:
MH Kim J Park YG Park YE Cho D Kim DJ Lee KW Kwak J Lee DW Han

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty-four patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring were randomized to receive either propofol-based TIVA (n=33) or remimazolam-based TIVA (n=31), both with remifentanil. The primary outcome was the change in N20 SEP latency from baseline to 30 minutes after anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included changes in P37 latency, SEP amplitudes,...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue